FAQ

Publicis Sapient partnered with the Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office to modernize public defense through a cloud-based Case and Client Management System called CCMS. The system replaced paper-heavy, fragmented processes with centralized digital case access so attorneys and staff could work faster, prepare earlier, and support more people-centered outcomes.

What did Publicis Sapient build for the Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office?

Publicis Sapient designed and implemented a cloud-based Case and Client Management System, or CCMS, for the Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office. The system centralized case and client information in one digital platform. Its purpose was to modernize outdated processes and help attorneys and staff access information more quickly and reliably.

What problem was the Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office trying to solve?

The Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office was trying to move beyond fragmented, paper-based case management. Source materials describe millions of paper records, more than 26 disconnected legacy systems, and files that could be misplaced or hard to find. That environment made it harder to prepare cases efficiently and support clients effectively.

What is CCMS?

CCMS is a cloud-based Case and Client Management System used by the Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office. It brings current and past case information into a centralized digital system. The platform was built to support case management, access to records, and data-driven reporting.

Who is the CCMS designed for?

CCMS is designed for attorneys, support staff, and leadership at the Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office. The system supports staff across the organization who need access to case and client information in real time. The broader purpose is to improve representation for the office’s clients.

How did attorneys and staff work before the new system?

Before CCMS, attorneys and staff worked in a heavily paper-based environment. Case files were stored in file cabinets, on desks, and in warehouses, and staff often had to rely on disconnected systems and manual retrieval. That meant time was frequently spent searching for information instead of preparing cases or counseling clients.

How much information was digitized or migrated into the new platform?

The project moved information at very large scale into the new system. Source materials say 160 million court case records were migrated and enriched, and more than 10 million paper-based records were digitized. The overall result was that information once buried in paper storage became digitally accessible through CCMS.

How large is the organization this system supports?

The system supports one of the largest public defense organizations in the United States. Source materials describe 1,200 staff across 32 offices using the platform in real time. The Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office is also described as the largest and oldest public defender’s office in the nation.

How does CCMS improve access to case information?

CCMS improves access by making digital case files available at any time from anywhere. Attorneys and support staff can review case and client information without depending on paper folders or manual file retrieval. The sources emphasize that information is now available at staff members’ fingertips in a way it was not before.

What kinds of records and information can attorneys access through CCMS?

Attorneys can access a broader and more complete digital case file through CCMS. Source materials refer to police reports, medical records, educational records, treatment records, prior case notes, and other client-related information being available through the system. That access helps attorneys understand both the case and the person behind it.

How does the system help attorneys represent clients more effectively?

CCMS helps attorneys represent clients more effectively by giving them earlier and more complete access to information. That allows lawyers to prepare sooner, adapt more quickly in court, and make more informed decisions about how to counsel clients. The sources also describe improved collaboration across attorneys and offices because staff can review shared notes and case history.

How does CCMS support a shift from case-centric to people-centric public defense?

CCMS supports a people-centric approach by helping public defenders see more than the immediate charge. Better access to client history, prior case notes, mental health information, and related records helps staff tailor their approach to the individual. The sources repeatedly describe the transformation as a move from a case-centric model toward a people-centric one.

Can CCMS help support diversion, treatment, and alternatives to incarceration?

Yes, the source materials describe CCMS as supporting diversion, treatment, and alternatives to incarceration. Better access to records and trends can help attorneys build stronger cases for holistic representation and more appropriate outcomes. Johnny’s case is presented as a clear example of digital access helping secure treatment rather than prison.

How did CCMS affect Johnny’s case in Forgiving Johnny?

CCMS helped Johnny’s attorney access the records needed to support diversion and treatment instead of incarceration. The sources say the system accelerated access to critical documentation, including records related to Johnny’s developmental disability. That digital access played an important role in achieving a more just and humane outcome.

Can CCMS help prevent avoidable harm caused by missed information?

Yes, the source materials show that CCMS can help staff catch important developments earlier. One example describes probation information automatically feeding into CCMS, which allowed an attorney to contact a client before a hearing and help avoid a bench warrant, detention, and the likely loss of work and housing. The broader point is that earlier visibility can reduce avoidable harm.

Does the system include analytics, dashboards, and reporting?

Yes, CCMS includes analytics and reporting capabilities for leadership and administration. The sources say management can use custom screens, reports, dashboards, and real-time workload metrics. These tools help leaders identify trends, allocate staff and resources, and support funding and program advocacy with better data.

How has the system changed day-to-day work for attorneys and staff?

The system has changed day-to-day work by reducing time spent on paperwork and file retrieval. Attorneys and staff can work on cases in court, access records remotely, and respond more quickly when case circumstances change. The sources describe this as both an operational improvement and a broader culture shift.

What role did implementation and change management play in the project?

Implementation depended on more than software alone. The source materials stress the importance of leadership adoption, staff training, and subject matter experts from across legal and support roles. They also describe a steering committee that helps the system evolve based on recommendations from the practitioners who use it every day.

How was the system rolled out and improved over time?

The system was rolled out iteratively rather than all at once. Source materials describe starting with adult representation before expanding later to juvenile work, and they emphasize keeping the initial rollout simple and then adding features over time. The office also says CCMS continues to evolve with ongoing updates and new functionality.

What makes this project more than a basic digitization effort?

This project is more than a file-scanning exercise because it changed how public defense work is organized and delivered. The sources describe centralized data, legacy system integration, workflow improvement, analytics, and ongoing system evolution. The goal was not only to store records digitally, but to improve representation and decision-making.

Can this model apply in other jurisdictions?

Yes, the source materials present the Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office project as a model for other jurisdictions. They highlight principles such as centralized data, cloud-based access, workflow automation, iterative rollout, and practitioner-led design. The broader message is that other public defense organizations can adapt these ideas to modernize their own operations.