From emergency telehealth to distributed care: redesigning health experiences for trust, convenience and continuity

Telehealth’s rapid rise began as a response to disruption, but its long-term value depends on something more fundamental than access alone. For many patients, virtual care was initially a cautious compromise: useful, safe and necessary, but not yet the experience they would choose by default. That distinction matters. It means the next phase of digital health is not about preserving an emergency substitute for in-person care. It is about building a more durable distributed care model—one that makes health experiences easier to navigate, more connected across settings and more trustworthy over time.

Publicis Sapient research showed that patients did adopt telehealth at scale, but with hesitation. In the early phase of pandemic-driven behavior change, 56% of patients had tried telehealth over a three- to six-month period, and 55% said they chose it to reduce their risk of contracting COVID-19. That signals acceptance, but also context: usage was driven largely by necessity. For healthcare leaders, the opportunity now is to move beyond episodic virtual visits and rethink how digital can support a broader care journey built around convenience, confidence and continuity.

The lesson from telehealth adoption is not simply that patients will use digital health tools. It is that they will use them when the experience solves a real problem with minimal friction. That puts experience design at the center of the distributed care model. When people engage digitally, they increasingly expect the same basics they value everywhere else: ease, speed, clarity and control. In health, those expectations are even more important because the stakes are higher and the moments are more personal.

Research into digital health behaviors makes clear that barriers remain. The biggest obstacle patients cite is the belief that their condition requires an in-person visit. That will not disappear—and it should not. Virtual care is not meant to replace every physical interaction. Instead, it should complement in-person care in ways that reduce unnecessary effort, improve access to the right expertise and make the overall journey feel more coherent. Another barrier is usability: a notable share of people still lack confidence in their ability to navigate telehealth technology. This is where durable adoption will be won or lost. If digital health tools feel confusing, fragmented or burdensome, patients will not experience them as progress.

A stronger model begins by reframing telehealth as one node in a distributed care ecosystem. In that ecosystem, care is not defined by location alone. It is defined by how well the experience connects people, information and decisions across touchpoints. A virtual consultation, a specialist referral, a follow-up message, a patient portal, a mobile reminder and an in-person appointment should not feel like separate systems that the patient must stitch together. They should feel like one connected relationship.

This is what makes distributed care strategically important. It is not just about adding digital channels. It is about integrating multiple relationships into a seamless model that works the way people now expect digital experiences to work. That means multi-specialist coordination that is visible to the patient, timely responses to messages, fewer repetitive steps, and interactions that add value without requiring unnecessary effort from the end user.

Patients are already pointing to the improvements that would make telehealth and digital care experiences more useful. The priorities are practical and revealing. They do not begin with futuristic features. They begin with fixing the basics that create trust and convenience.

Scheduling is often the first true test of a digital health experience. Patients say a mobile app for scheduling would improve telehealth significantly. That should be read as more than a feature request. It is a signal that health systems still create too much friction at the very start of the journey. Mobile scheduling should help patients quickly find the right appointment type, understand whether a visit should be virtual or in person, and make changes without calling, waiting or starting over.

Patients also want online portals where medical information can be easily accessed. Too often, portals function as repositories rather than guides. In a distributed care model, the portal should become a practical front door: a place where patients can review records, prepare for visits, access next steps, manage referrals and stay oriented across a multi-touchpoint care journey. Accessibility matters here in the broadest sense—clear language, intuitive navigation and experiences that work for people with different levels of digital confidence.

Healthcare journeys rarely involve a single relationship. For many patients, the friction is not the appointment itself but what happens between appointments: repeated information, unclear ownership and gaps between providers. A stronger distributed care model must connect multi-specialist interactions so the burden of coordination does not fall on the patient. Patients should feel that care teams are aligned, informed and able to move them forward without duplication or delay.

Patients have also indicated that more personalized communication would improve the telehealth experience. Personalization in healthcare should not mean novelty for its own sake. It should mean relevance: the right message, at the right moment, in the right format, based on where someone is in their journey. Reminders, follow-ups, preparation guidance and care updates should feel tailored to individual needs rather than broadcast to everyone the same way.

When people are uncertain, they need responsive support that does not create more work. Digital experiences should help patients get answers quickly, understand what to do next and recover smoothly when something goes wrong. In a category where even a small usability issue can create anxiety, lower-friction support is not a nice-to-have. It is part of trust.

Convenience is essential, but convenience alone will not sustain adoption in healthcare. Patients also need confidence: confidence that digital care is appropriate for the moment, confidence that their information is available where it should be, confidence that someone will respond, and confidence that they are not navigating the system alone. This is why the future of virtual care is inseparable from service design, operational alignment and experience strategy.

Healthcare organizations that lead here will not treat telehealth as a standalone channel. They will redesign experiences end to end. They will connect digital and physical touchpoints so each strengthens the other. They will simplify how patients move through scheduling, consultation, referral, follow-up and support. And they will reduce the amount of effort required from patients at every step.

The next chapter of digital health will belong to organizations that understand a simple truth: patients do not want more channels. They want better journeys. The goal is not to persuade people to choose virtual care over in-person care in every case. The goal is to create a distributed care model in which each interaction—digital or physical—fits naturally into a connected whole.

Telehealth opened the door. Now healthcare leaders have the opportunity to build what comes next: experiences that are not just available, but trusted; not just digital, but intuitive; not just efficient, but continuous. When mobile scheduling works, portals are truly useful, specialists are better coordinated, communications are more personal and support is easier to access, virtual care becomes more than a substitute. It becomes part of a fundamentally better health experience.

Relevant Links

• Inaugural Publicis Sapient Report Finds At-Home Experiences Will Remain the New Normal Post-COVID
• Inaugural Publicis Sapient Report Finds At-Home Experiences Will Remain the New Normal Post-COVID
• The first wave of digital retail transformation was reactive
• Contactless Has Moved Far Beyond a Pandemic-Era Workaround
• México ante el nuevo mandato del comercio digital: conveniencia, personalización y rentabilidad en una economía omnicanal (LATAM)
• Total Commerce
• Commerce connecté en Europe : transformer l’expérience client sans sacrifier la rentabilité (Europe)