Wealth and Asset Management 4.0
How Digital, Social, and Regulatory Shifts Will Transform the Industry
Publicis Sapient
Research Background
We conducted a comprehensive survey of 500 investment providers across 15 countries and three regions to analyze how investment firms are adapting their strategies, products, and business models to meet fast-changing investor expectations. The survey included a mix of providers by country, function, and type of firm:
- Regions: 31% Asia-Pacific, 30% Europe, 39% North America
- Sectors: Investment advisory groups, retail asset managers, broker-dealers, online brokerages/robo-advisors, private banks, family offices, trust companies, institutional asset managers, and alternative asset managers
- Respondent Roles: 50% C-level executives, 50% managing directors or senior vice presidents
- Assets Under Management (AUM): Ranged from $500 million to $2.5 trillion+
- 29% up to $10 billion
- 44% $10–$100 billion
- 27% over $100 billion
Countries Surveyed
- Asia Pacific (31%): Australia (5%), Hong Kong (6%), Japan (10%), China (6%), Singapore (4%)
- Europe (30%): Benelux (4%), Germany (4%), UK/Ireland (10%), France (5%), Switzerland (7%)
- North America (39%): Canada (11%), United States (28%)
Respondents by Sector
- 26% Investment advisory group
- 14% Retail asset management
- 12% Broker-dealer
- 11% Online brokerage/robo-advisor
- 11% Private bank
- 10% Family office
- 7% Trust company
- 5% Institutional asset management
- 4% Alternative asset management
We also surveyed 2,325 investors across wealth levels, ages, and locations to understand how well wealth management providers are meeting customer needs and expectations. The survey covered four regions: APAC, Europe, the Middle East, and North America.
Respondents by Wealth Level
- 7% Mass market
- 23% Mass affluent
- 39% High net worth (HNW)
- 10% Very high net worth (VHNW)
- 19% Ultra-high net worth (UHNW)
- 2% Billionaires
Respondents by Generation
- 4% Gen Z
- 26% Millennials
- 30% Gen X
- 40% Baby Boomers plus
Respondents by Gender
Countries Surveyed
- Asia Pacific (23%): Australia (3%), China (6%), Hong Kong (2%), India (4%), Japan (6%), Singapore (2%)
- Europe (30%): Benelux (3%), France (8%), Germany (8%), Switzerland (3%), UK (8%)
- Middle East (4%): Saudi Arabia (2%), UAE (2%)
- North America (42%): Canada (3%), US (39%)
Maturity Methodology
A prime objective of this research was to determine what constitutes digital leadership in the wealth and asset management industry. ThoughtLab assessed firms using two key criteria:
- Progress on digital transformation across 12 business dimensions
- ROI on digital investments in 24 business areas
Organizations were categorized into three maturity stages:
- Beginner: 27%
- Implementer: 53%
- Leader: 20%
Digital Maturity Framework
- Respondents rated their progress on 12 business areas (e.g., interactive customer experience, digital compliance, modernized core IT, data management, innovation mindset) on a five-point scale.
- Respondents rated ROI on significant technology investments in 24 key areas (e.g., portfolio management, trade processing, portfolio accounting and custody, client account servicing) on a four-point scale (negative, low, average, high).
Incumbents Jump Ahead in Digital Competitiveness
Five years ago, fintechs led in digital innovation. Now, trust firms, wealth advisory groups, and retail asset managers are furthest ahead in digital maturity, followed by broker-dealers and private banks. These incumbents are now more digitally advanced than fintechs, due to larger size, deeper investment in digital transformation, and acquisition or development of fintech capabilities.
Some incumbents, such as institutional and alternative asset managers and family offices, are lagging. Family offices are the furthest behind, with more than half just starting their digital journeys. Larger firms are more digitally advanced: only 3% of firms with over $100 billion in AUM are beginners, while 40% are leaders. North American firms are the most mature; APAC firms are trailing slightly.
Maturity Stage by Firm Size (AUM)
- Up to $10bn: 49% Beginner, 44% Implementer, 7% Leader
- $10–$100bn: 28% Beginner, 56% Implementer, 16% Leader
- Over $100bn: 2% Beginner, 58% Implementer, 40% Leader
Maturity Stage by Firm Type
- Trust company: 31% Beginner, 40% Implementer, 29% Leader
- Wealth advisory: 27% Beginner, 46% Implementer, 27% Leader
- Retail: 21% Beginner, 55% Implementer, 25% Leader
- Broker-dealer: 17% Beginner, 61% Implementer, 22% Leader
- Private bank: 19% Beginner, 59% Implementer, 22% Leader
- Online/robo-advisor: 32% Beginner, 56% Implementer, 12% Leader
- Institutional: 22% Beginner, 70% Implementer, 9% Leader
- Alternative: 27% Beginner, 68% Implementer, 5% Leader
- Family office: 54% Beginner, 42% Implementer, 4% Leader
Maturity Stage by Region
- APAC: 32% Beginner, 47% Implementer, 21% Leader
- Europe: 26% Beginner, 57% Implementer, 17% Leader
- North America: 24% Beginner, 54% Implementer, 22% Leader
Digital Transformation Boosts Performance Across Key Indicators
As firms advance in digital transformation, they see steady improvement in key performance indicators:
- Productivity: +13.0% (all firms), +16.1% (family offices), +15.3% (private banks)
- AUM: +8.1% (all firms), +12% (institutional managers), +10.4% (alternative managers)
- Revenue: +7.7% (all firms), +8.9% (alternatives), +8.6% (retail firms)
- Market share: +7.3% (all firms), +10.8% (alternatives), +9.6% (private banks)
- Shareholder value: +5.8% (all firms), +6.8% (family offices), +6.4% (private banks and retail firms)
The Big Shift: The Pandemic Redefined Investor Views, Relationships, and Behaviors
Views on Investing
- 50%: Risk mitigation & diversification is a key objective
- 49%: More concerned about regulatory & tax changes
- 42%: Moved from passive to active management
- 42%: More interested in holistic financial planning
- 38%: Finding new sources of returns is a larger priority
- 20%: More interested in investing for the social good
Relationships with Advisors
- 46%: Advisor found new ways to engage
- 37%: Relied on advisor for ongoing support
- 36%: Became more reliant on provider guidance
- 30%: More at ease with digital tools
- 27%: Moved accounts to more firms to mitigate risks
- 24%: Poor personal service hurt advisor relationship
Behaviors and Fees
- 44%: Include family members more in wealth decisions
- 41%: More willing to pay fees for advice
- 40%: Digital access is a higher ongoing priority
- 38%: Spend more time with finances & investments
- 33%: Prioritize succession planning
- 32%: Reevaluating wealth management fees
Accelerated Market Megatrends
Megatrend 1: Shift to Digital
- 40% of investors say digital access is a greater priority
- 75% of wealth executives expect digital interaction to be the norm in 2 years
- 89% of investors say their preferred channel will be mobile apps
Megatrend 2: Investing with Purpose
- 34% of investors will seek ESG investing advice in 2 years
- Over 40% of providers believe clients expect ESG knowledge and products
Megatrend 3: Democratization
- 67% of investors want to invest in alternatives, 49% in IPOs
- 58% will want personalized financial planning, 53% day-to-day financial management
Megatrend 4: Higher Standards
- 49% of investors say acting in their best interests is the most effective way for advisors to build relationships
- 49% are more concerned about regulatory and tax changes
Megatrend 5: Transparent, Lower Fees
- Only 37% of investors are happy with provider fees, 36% with fee structures, 35% understand advisor compensation
Megatrend 6: Switching Providers
- One-third of investors moved over 20% of funds to providers that offered what they want in the last year; 44% plan to do so in the next two years
Digital Engagement Becomes the Norm
Wealth firms expect 75% of all interactions with investors to be digital in two years. Investors agree: mobile apps will be the primary mode of engagement, followed by websites and virtual conferencing. Use of websites, email, messaging, and texting is declining, while virtual conferencing and social media are on the rise. Investors want a blend of personal and virtual contact in the future.
Current Channel Use vs. Future Preference
- Provider's website: 77% now, 67% future
- Provider's mobile app: 75% now, 89% future
- Virtual conferencing: 63% now, 58% future
- Phone calls: 53% now, 48% future
- Face-to-face: 32% now, 47% future
- Email: 30% now, 23% future
- Messaging apps: 20% now, 18% future
- Social media: 20% now, 29% future
- Text: 12% now, 8% future
- Postal mail: 3% now, 2% future
Primary Engagement Channels Providers Expect in 2 Years: 75% Digital, 25% Non-digital
"The end-goal of a financial manager should be to create a frictionless experience for customers when they want to engage, how they want to engage, and in what channel they want to engage, in real time." — David Donovan, Financial Services Practice Leader, North America, Publicis Sapient
Mobile Investing Comes of Age
Investors will want to carry out most activities from their mobile devices in less than two years. Providers understand this trend, but some underestimate the future dominance of mobile apps and overestimate website usage.
Channel Usage in Two Years: Investors vs. Providers
Accessing Account Information:
- Mobile app: 55% investors, 49% providers
- Website: 22% investors, 20% providers
Accessing Market Insights and Analysis:
- Mobile app: 41% investors, 36% providers
- Website: 18% investors, 21% providers
Learning About Products and Services:
- Mobile app: 41% investors, 34% providers
- Website: 26% investors, 31% providers
Opening Accounts:
- Mobile app: 45% investors, 42% providers
- Website: 19% investors, 25% providers
Activities for Which Investors Will Use Mobile Apps the Most:
- Access account info: 55%
- Monitor performance: 50%
- Learn about products: 41%
- Open accounts: 45%
- Submit trades: 41%
- Access market insights: 41%
Where Websites Will Be Used the Most:
- Learn about products: 26%
- Submit trades: 25%
- Portfolio rebalancing: 21%
- Monitor performance: 19%
- Open accounts: 19%
- Access market insights: 18%
Where Virtual Conferencing Will Be Used the Most:
- Scheduled meetings: 38%
- Ad hoc interaction: 36%
- Financial planning: 20%
- Portfolio rebalancing: 25%
- Investment advice: 18%
- Opening accounts: 13%
Where Phone Calls Will Be Used the Most:
- Ad hoc interactions: 22%
- Investment advice: 21%
- Scheduled meetings: 20%
- Portfolio rebalancing: 13%
- Financial planning: 10%
- Submit trades: 8%
Where Face-to-Face Will Be Used the Most:
- Scheduled meetings: 22%
- Ad hoc interactions: 16%
- Financial planning: 16%
- Opening accounts: 15%
- Investment advice: 14%
- Portfolio rebalancing: 3%
The Shift to Digital: Myths and Realities
Myth #1: Digital is for the young and mass market
- Channel preferences are largely the same for millennials and the oldest and richest investors.
- Provider's mobile app: 89% (all groups)
- Provider's website: 74% (UHNW/billionaires), 67% (Boomers), 62% (Millennials)
- Virtual conferencing: 63% (UHNW/billionaires), 63% (Boomers), 65% (Millennials)
- Face-to-face: 41% (UHNW/billionaires), 47% (Boomers), 46% (Millennials)
Myth #2: Millennials only want to do things digitally
- 34% of millennials interact with primary wealth providers through face-to-face meetings, and 46% prefer face-to-face interaction in the future. 43% interact through phone calls, and this will remain steady.
The Rise of Social Impact Investing
Wealth providers recognize the growing importance of social impact investing to their clients. Four out of ten report that senior management is committed to social and cultural values, both in operations and investment. Regulation is also increasing the impact of ESG.
- 41%: Clients expect ESG knowledge and products
- 41%: Senior management committed to inclusion and diversity
- 39%: Clients care about the firm’s stance on environmental and social policies
- 36%: ESG investing is here to stay and will grow
- 35%: Clients willing to accept lower returns for sustainable investment goals
- 31%: Clients believe they can achieve higher returns through ESG
- 27%: Clients of all ages and wealth levels are interested in ESG
- 24%: Clients care about ESG fund classifications
- 24%: Interest in ESG will decrease if the market declines
- 12%: Most ESG funds don’t do a good job selecting companies that deliver on ESG goals
Most ESG Driven Countries: Japan, France, United States, UK/Ireland, Switzerland, Germany
Myths About ESG Investing
Myth 1: Younger generations care more about social and sustainability issues
- Baby boomers plan to invest more than millennials in green bonds and ESG funds over the next two years.
- Green bonds: 10% (Millennials), 15% (Boomers)
- ESG funds: 22% (Millennials), 32% (Boomers)
- Advice on social impact: 29% (Millennials), 36% (Boomers)
Myth 2: Wealthy investors care less about ESG goals
- Billionaires plan to invest much more in ESG than the average investor.
- Overall ESG investing: 61% (Billionaires), 34% (Average)
- Green bonds: 50% (Billionaires), 13% (Average)
- ESG funds: 36% (Billionaires), 27% (Average)
Democratization of Investment Products and Services
Clients across generations and wealth levels are seeking more specialized products. While about three-quarters of investors use actively managed mutual funds now, this will drop slightly in two years, with growth in passive funds and individual securities. Over two-thirds plan to use alternative investments such as hedge funds and private equity. Investors are also looking to boost alpha through specialized products like IPOs, tax-exempt investments, commodities, derivatives, REITs, and structured products. As the population ages, pensions, annuities, and whole life products are moving up the priority list. Crypto remains divisive.
% of Investors Planning to Use Specialized Products in 2 Years
- Alternatives: 67%
- IPOs: 49%
- Tax-exempt investments: 47%
- Commodities/derivatives: 45%
- Annuities/life insurance: 45%
- Pensions/retirement: 40%
- Real estate and REITs: 34%
- Structured products: 32%
- ESG funds/ETFs: 27%
- Private placements/venture capital: 23%
- Special rights issues: 21%
- Art advisory and financing: 18%
- Separately managed accounts: 18%
- Bitcoin and crypto currencies: 16%
- Green bonds: 16%
- Charitable investments: 13%
- SPACs: 13%
% Investors Using Traditional Products Now and in 2 Years
- Active mutual funds: 74% now, 68% in 2 years (-6%)
- Individual bonds: 31% now, 39% in 2 years (+8%)
- Passive funds/ETFs: 30% now, 39% in 2 years (+9%)
- Individual stocks: 30% now, 37% in 2 years (+7%)
Wealth Management Service Needs Converge Across Segments
Demand for personalized, goal-based planning and other specialized services continues to grow, blurring differences across segments. More than half of investors use personalized planning services, and almost half take advice on non-investment financial services. In the future, the biggest growth areas will be healthcare and retirement planning, next-generation succession planning, and real estate investment advice.
Services Investors Most Use Now
- Personal financial budgeting & planning: 56%
- Advice on non-investment financial services: 49%
- Day-to-day financial management: 47%
- Tax planning: 41%
- Holistic advice/coaching on life goals: 39%
- Planning & financial services for businesses: 37%
- Estate planning: 35%
- Financial education & training: 28%
- Investing in real estate: 28%
- Healthcare, aging, & retirement planning: 22%
- Next-gen succession planning: 21%
- Concierge services: 19%
- Access to loans: 13%
- Family office set-up & governance advice: 11%
- Guidance on philanthropy: 9%
Services Used More in 2 Years (Growth)
- Healthcare/retirement planning: +11%
- Next-gen succession planning: +11%
- Real estate: +10%
- Services for businesses: +9%
- Family office advice: +8%
- Day-to-day financial management: +6%
- Estate planning: +6%
- Non-investment services: +5%
- Concierge services: +5%
- Financial education: +4%
Investors Expect Firms to Meet Higher Standards
Investors expect their advisors to act in their best interest, ethically, and with integrity. Some, especially the richest, will switch accounts if they don’t. Investors value ethical business practices, leadership vision and integrity, and inclusion when selecting and evaluating wealth management relationships.
Best Ways to Build a Relationship
- Act in my best interest: 49%
- Available when I need them: 46%
- Stay in touch during market disruptions: 43%
- Support social, community, and philanthropy: 18%
Key Criteria When Selecting Firms
- Ethical business practices: 48%
- Vision and integrity: 41%
- Approach to inclusion: 39%
- Social purpose: 34%
- Treatment of employees: 31%
59% of billionaires say ethical business practices are a key selection criterion. 48% say supporting social and philanthropic initiatives is the best way for a firm to start a relationship. 46% moved over 20% of their assets to another firm last year because the culture was more aligned with their social values.
Regulators Are Upping the Stakes
Governments are introducing new investor protection regulations and, in some areas, increasing taxes. Providers expect the greatest regulatory headwinds from Japan, Canada, Benelux, Australia, US, and France. Potential areas include ESG, transparency, data security and privacy, fintech, and cryptocurrency. Taxes, particularly in the US, are also expected to rise.
Top 10 Regulations on the Horizon
- Data privacy (55%)
- Cybersecurity (50%)
- Fintech-related regulation (40%)
- Investor protection (36%)
- Anti-corruption (33%)
- Risk management (33%)
- KYC/AML (32%)
- Conduct & control (31%)
- Individual accountability (30%)
- Open data and open APIs (25%)
Lower Fees and Greater Transparency
Trading increased during the pandemic, as did pricing pressures from regulators, changing fee structures, and fintech competitors. Firms are seeing the greatest pricing pressures from regulators, account aggregation, competition, low-cost passive investments, demand for new fee structures, and zero trading fees. Institutional asset managers, private banks, and retail asset managers are feeling the pricing pinch more than others.
Where Firms Are Seeing the Greatest Pricing Pressures
- Pressure from regulators: 46%
- Account aggregation: 41%
- Competition: 40%
- Low-cost passive: 36%
- Demand for new fee structures: 35%
- Low-cost or no-cost: 34%
- Declining fee minimums: 33%
- Zero trading fees: 26%
- Group discounting: 24%
Feeling the Pricing Pinch: Average % of All Pressures
- Institutional asset management: 38.6%
- Private bank: 36.7%
- Retail asset management: 36.7%
- Broker-dealer/wire house: 35.4%
- Family/multifamily office: 35.1%
- All: 35.0%
- Investment/wealth advisory group: 35.0%
- Online brokerage/robo-advisor: 32.9%
- Trust company: 32.1%
- Alternative asset management: 31.7%
Fees Are a Sore Spot for Many Investors
Fewer than four out of ten investors are happy with the fees their wealth providers charge and the way they charge them. Only about a third understand how their wealth advisors are compensated. Nearly one-fifth feel they pay too much for transaction services, 16% worry about hidden costs, and 14% find it hard to understand the fees they pay for investment services. One in ten investors would transfer more self-directed investments to discretionary accounts if fees were lower.
% Agreeing with Statements About Fees
- Happy with provider’s fees: 37%
- Happy with provider’s fee structures: 36%
- Understand how wealth manager is compensated: 35%
- Happy with fees for managing assets directly: 22%
- Paying too much for transaction services: 18%
- Concerned about hidden costs: 16%
- Paying too much for investment products: 15%
- Find it hard to understand fees for investment products: 14%
- Would use discretionary investing more if fees were lower: 10%
- Taking fees into account, can outperform a wealth manager: 3%
Investors Will Switch Providers to Get What They Want
One-third of investors changed providers over the last year—and 55% of billionaires did so. Over half switched to improve investment performance, while 42% transferred funds to firms that offered a broader range of products and services. Other reasons include better wealth advice, stronger digital experience, better personal service, and better pricing structures and fees. Looking ahead, 44% say they will switch over the next two years to get what they want.
% of Investors Moving Over 20% of Funds
- Last year: 33% Yes, 67% No
- Next two years: 44% Yes, 56% No
Reasons Investors Switched Providers
- Better investment performance: 53%
- Broader range of products: 42%
- Access to better wealth advice: 38%
- Better digital experience: 34%
- Advice on investment matters: 34%
- Better personal service: 31%
- Access to holistic financial planning: 28%
- Personal contact/advisor whom I trust: 24%
- Fee structure better meets my needs: 23%
- Lower fees: 19%
- Desire to manage assets directly: 19%
- Access to social impact investments: 16%
- Culture more aligned with my values: 13%
Investors Are Likely to Follow Their Advisors to Another Firm
More than half of investors see advisors or advisory teams as their primary relationship. Loyalty to advisors is even higher for the mass market and billionaires. Over six out of ten investors are likely or very likely to follow their advisors to another firm; for UHNW and billionaires, this rises to seven out of ten. Baby boomers and millennials are the most likely to follow advisors; Gen Xers and Zers are the least. Men are more likely to leave with their advisors than women (67% vs. 55%).
Primary Relationship
- Advisor: 23% (all), 30% (mass), 17% (HNW), 18% (VHNW), 24% (UHNW), 39% (billionaires)
- Advisory team: 32% (all), 38% (mass), 30% (HNW), 33% (VHNW), 27% (UHNW), 36% (billionaires)
- Firm: 45% (all), 32% (mass), 52% (HNW), 48% (VHNW), 49% (UHNW), 25% (billionaires)
Likelihood to Move with Advisor
- All: 36% somewhat likely, 43% likely, 19% very likely
- Boomers+: 35% somewhat likely, 43% likely, 21% very likely
- Gen X: 40% somewhat likely, 39% likely, 20% very likely
- Millennials: 33% somewhat likely, 50% likely, 15% very likely
- Gen Z: 47% somewhat likely, 47% likely, 7% very likely
- Billionaires: 29% somewhat likely, 59% likely, 12% very likely
- UHNW: 27% somewhat likely, 56% likely, 13% very likely
- VHNW: 51% somewhat likely, 37% likely, 9% very likely
- HNW: 38% somewhat likely, 39% likely, 20% very likely
- Mass: 36% somewhat likely, 40% likely, 23% very likely
Over the Next Two Years, Investors Will Look to Add Providers
Many investors will add providers over the next two years, especially as they get richer. Only 6% prefer fewer providers. Currently, investors typically have around two providers; the number increases with wealth level. Most will maintain this number, but many will add more. Almost half of Gen-Z and millennial respondents plan to add providers as they become wealthier. Diversification of risk is the main reason for adding accounts, particularly for the ultra-rich.
Fewer or More Providers in the Future?
- Prefer fewer: 6%
- Stay with the same number: 53%
- Prefer more: 42%
Number of Providers Investors Work with Now
- 1: 34%
- 2: 44%
- 3: 16%
- 4: 4%
- 5: 1%
- Prefer more firms in future: 42%
Reasons to Prefer More Providers
- Diversify risks: 45%
- Access to more products & services: 44%
- Shop around for better performance: 42%
- Advice from a variety of experts: 38%
- Reduce costs: 35%
- Maintain privacy: 11%
Investors Redefined: What Should Providers Do Differently?
To succeed in a digital era, wealth management providers must listen to what their customers are saying. Investors want providers to present innovative ideas, act in their best interest, be available when needed, and offer holistic and social impact advice. Many new demands are converging across wealth levels, so providers should focus on the person, not the demographic, and shift from a product to a client focus.
Investor Voices:
- “They should play an important role in all my investment strategies openly and transparently.” (France, mass affluent baby boomer)
- “Provide me with tailored advice and services to support and grow my new business.” (Australia, mass affluent millennial)
- “Forward-thinking and innovative approach for my investments to secure our long-term future.” (US, mass affluent baby boomer)
- “My advisor should be available at anytime to provide me with the options that are best for me.” (Germany, HNW millennial)
- “Offer holistic management of services with high-level advisory and financial planning support.” (UK, HNW baby boomer)
- “Advisors must give me innovative ideas and suggestions on investments.” (US, HNW baby boomer)
- “They should focus on unique industry insights and diversified product offerings.” (Singapore, billionaire baby boomer)
- “My advisor should provide socially and environmentally responsible investment advice.” (US, Gen X billionaire)
- “I want my financial affairs to be managed in my best interest and cost-effectively.” (Germany, UHNW millennial)
Providers Need to Assess How Well Their Offerings Align with Investor Needs
What investors want most are better ideas for investments and high returns, a simple, intuitive digital experience, providers that act ethically and in their best interests, and a wide range of products and services, including active, tax-efficient, and specialized products. Providers, however, are primarily stressing the personal relationship, with even online brokers and robo-advisory firms adding the human touch in a hybrid model.
Top 6 Ways Investors Say Firms Can Attract Them
- 57%: Innovative investment ideas
- 50%: High returns geared to risk tolerance
- 49%: Act in my best interest
- 48%: Wide range of products and services
- 47%: Valuable advice
- 46%: Available when I need them
Top 6 Criteria Investors Use to Select Firms
- 49%: Intuitive digital experience
- 48%: Ethical business practices
- 48%: Active management products
- 48%: Tax-efficient products
- 42%: Specialized products
- 41%: Leadership vision and integrity
Top 6 Ways Providers Look to Differentiate
- 73%: Personal relationships
- 52%: Investment performance
- 48%: Digital client experience
- 40%: Low, transparent fees
- 34%: In-depth research/analysis
- 29%: Holistic wealth advice
Firms Are Rethinking Their Strategies for Investor Segments
Most wealth providers will focus on going up market, while keeping plans for the mass affluent in a holding pattern. The number of firms going after billionaires will almost double, from 11% to 20%. Over 60% will sharpen focus on the high-net-worth tier. Nine out of ten providers will target Gen-X, both now and in the future. Interest in baby boomers will grow the most over the next two years, increasing by 17 points to 80%. Focus on international clients will grow from 52% to 72%, and on offshore accounts from 45% to 64%.
Key Areas of Focus by Types of Clients and Accounts
- Domestic clients: 81% now, 76% in 2 years
- International clients: 52% now, 72% in 2 years
Key Areas of Focus for Providers
Wealth Level:
- Mass market ($25k–$100k): 18% now, 12% in 2 years (-6%)
- Mass affluent ($100k–$1m): 35% now, 36% in 2 years (+1%)
- High net worth tier one ($1–5m): 59% now, 62% in 2 years (+3%)
- High net worth tier two ($5–10m): 49% now, 66% in 2 years (+17%)
- Very high net worth ($10–30m): 34% now, 56% in 2 years (+22%)
- Ultra-high-net-worth ($30m–$1b): 24% now, 35% in 2 years (+11%)
- Billionaires (over $1b): 11% now, 20% in 2 years (+9%)
Age Group:
- Generation Z (under 25): 4% now, 7% in 2 years (+3%)
- Millennials (25–40): 61% now, 66% in 2 years (+5%)
- Generation X (41–56): 93% now, 96% in 2 years (+3%)
- Baby Boomers (57–75): 63% now, 80% in 2 years (+17%)
- Silent generation (over 75): 6% now, 16% in 2 years (+10%)
Going Deeper into Niche Opportunities for Growth
Wealth management firms see corporate executives, religious groups, and beneficiaries as key targets for future growth. Over three-quarters focus on executives, and over a third on specific religious groups (rising to nearly half in two years). The share focusing on beneficiaries will almost double to 46% in two years. Focus on retirees will also almost double, from 10% to 19%.
Investor Type Focus Now and in 2 Years
- Corporate executives: 77% now, 79% in 2 years
- Employees of specific companies: 54% now, 63% in 2 years
- Entrepreneur/business owner: 55% now, 62% in 2 years
- Specific religious groups: 35% now, 48% in 2 years
- Beneficiaries of existing clients: 24% now, 46% in 2 years
- Women: 19% now, 26% in 2 years
- Specific cultural/ethnic groups: 21% now, 25% in 2 years
- Retirees: 10% now, 19% in 2 years
- Physicians/dentists: 14% now, 18% in 2 years
- Recently divorced: 9% now, 10% in 2 years
- Professional athletes/entertainers: 9% now, 9% in 2 years
Avoiding Market Misconceptions
- Misconception 1: Wealth providers can drive huge gains by consolidating client assets. In fact, only 6% of investors prefer fewer providers; 53% want to stay with the same number and 42% prefer more.
- Misconception 2: The best way for providers to differentiate is through personal relationships. Actually, providing innovative investment ideas is the best way to attract investors (57%).
- Misconception 3: Investors are generally happy with their firms’ fees and pricing models. More than 6 out of 10 are not happy, and many are switching providers for better fee structures.
- Misconception 4: Generational wealth transfer is moving the focus from older investors to millennials. Providers are planning to shift more attention to baby boomers (from 63% now to 80% in 2 years) than to millennials (61% now to 66% in 2 years).
Rethinking Products, Services, and Fees
Firms are expanding up-market, enriching and expanding products and services, and entering new geographies. About half of broker-dealers and alternative asset firms plan to enter new geographies. Most family offices aim to enrich existing products and services, and 41% will add new ones. Trust companies will do the same, while changing distribution channels. About a third of providers will expand in their current niche and maximize cross-selling.
How Firms Plan to Change Business Strategies in Next 2 Years
- Expand up-market: 51% (all), 64% (alternative), 47% (broker-dealer), 62% (family office), 43% (institutional), 46% (wealth advisor), 30% (online/robo), 66% (private bank), 52% (retail asset), 71% (trust)
- Enrich existing products/services: 42% (all), 23% (alternative), 36% (broker-dealer), 62% (family office), 35% (institutional), 44% (wealth advisor), 39% (online/robo), 28% (private bank), 49% (retail asset), 46% (trust)
- Add new products/services: 41% (all), 41% (alternative), 36% (broker-dealer), 42% (family office), 48% (institutional), 43% (wealth advisor), 42% (online/robo), 48% (private bank), 32% (retail asset), 40% (trust)
- Enter new geographic markets: 37% (all), 50% (alternative), 49% (broker-dealer), 34% (family office), 30% (institutional), 41% (wealth advisor), 14% (online/robo), 40% (private bank), 37% (retail asset), 43% (trust)
Four Key Shifts Remaking Wealth Management Products and Services
Advances in technology have allowed firms to democratize their wealth management advice, reaching new clients who demand digital solutions. Four out of ten firms are democratizing their advice, products, services, and asset classes. To meet growing digital demands, 40% are automating financial planning and developing hybrid human-digital advice solutions. Advisors are also focusing on holistic advice (40%).
Shifts Reinventing Products and Services
- Democratization of wealth management advice: 42%
- Democratization of products, services, asset classes: 41%
- Ability to automate financial planning: 40%
- Development of hybrid human-digital advice solutions: 40%
- Rise of holistic advice: 40%
- Non-traditional sources of advice: 25%
- New, more transparent pricing structures: 33%
- Shift to passive and programmatic investing: 32%
Providers Will Offer a Wider Range of Products and Services
Almost two-thirds of providers plan to offer alternatives over the next two years—a top requirement for investors. Around four out of ten will offer private placements or venture capital opportunities. Offerings are generally in line with what clients want, but in some areas, providers could do better (e.g., commodities/derivatives, annuities).
% Providers Planning to Offer Products in 2 Years
- Alternatives: 61%
- Private placements/VC: 42%
- Pensions/retirement: 37%
- IPOs: 35%
- Specialized tax-exempt: 35%
- Art advisory/financing: 32%
- Annuities/life insurance: 30%
- ESG mutual funds/ETFs: 30%
- Indirect cryptocurrency: 29%
- Commodities/derivatives: 23%
- SPACs: 22%
- Green bonds: 18%
- Real estate and REITS: 18%
- Charitable investments: 17%
- Specialized lending: 15%
- Direct cryptocurrency: 10%
% Providers Planning to Offer Services in 2 Years
- Goals-based financial planning: 58%
- Business advisory services: 41%
- Legal advice: 31%
- Real estate investor services: 29%
- Completion of administrative financial tasks: 25%
- Estate planning: 25%
- Insurance services: 25%
- Advanced tax planning: 24%
- Cash and lending for individuals: 19%
- Trust services: 19%
- Cash and lending for entities: 18%
- Family office administration: 15%
- Financial education: 14%
- Guidance on philanthropy: 14%
- Concierge services: 10%
- Healthcare support: 4%
Providers Get the Fees Right in Some Areas—But Very Wrong in Others
Most investors prefer to pay for financial planning with a fixed or hourly fee, but 44% of providers expect to charge on a performance basis or as a percentage of AUM. For non-discretionary investment, investors also prefer hourly or fixed fees, but more than a third of providers plan to charge a percentage of AUM. In other areas, such as custody, transaction services, and discretionary wealth management, providers are more in tune with investor preferences.
Investors Are Willing to Switch for the Fee Structures They Want
The mismatch between provider fee structures and what investors want is particularly large for financial planning and non-discretionary investment. While only 7% of providers expect to offer fixed fees for financial planning in two years, around a fifth to a quarter of investors would switch providers to have those fee options. Providers should consider offering more flexible options to ensure retention.
To Offset Pricing Pressures, Firms Diversified Revenue Sources During the Pandemic
Management fees remain the top fee source for firms, followed by performance and transaction fees. Investment management is the largest revenue-producing business, followed by advisory services. Private banks are the most diversified, while alternative, institutional, and retail asset managers are more heavily weighted toward investment management. Broker-dealers, wealth advisory, family offices, and online brokerages/robo-advisors are more evenly split between investment and advisory services. Trust companies lean more toward the advisory side.
Firms Will Continue to Diversify Revenue Channels and Fees Over Next Two Years
About three-quarters of providers will sharpen their focus on investment management, and over half on advisory services. Banking/lending is a major new area of focus, particularly for family offices, trust companies, and broker-dealers. Insurance is another area of growth. On the fee side, management fees will continue to be a prime focus, with big jumps in net interest income from lending expected.
Winning in a Digital-First World
Wealth firms are making fast progress in digital transformation, with an average of 46% in mid or advanced stages. Almost three-quarters are ahead in interactive CX, and over half in automated processes, AI, blockchain, and cloud. Firms have made major strides in data analytics, cybersecurity, and digitized employee experiences. About four out of ten have made progress on building an innovation mindset and socially aware organizational culture. However, they are lagging on conversation monitoring, modernized core IT, software deployment, and digital compliance.
Not All Industry Segments Are Keeping Up the Pace
Private banks, retail asset managers, and broker-dealers are speeding ahead, while alternative asset managers and family offices are falling behind. Online brokerages and robo-advisors are falling behind in some areas, possibly due to higher digital standards.
As Cyberattacks Have Risen, Firms Invested Heavily in Data Security
About half of wealth management providers made their largest digital investments in cybersecurity over the last two years. Other major investments include data analytics, public cloud, and workflow automation.
Providers Are Boosting Their IT Spend to Speed Digital Transformation
Firms plan to raise total IT spending over the next two years, with the biggest increase in AI (up 11 percentage points, a 52% jump). AI is seen as having the most positive impact. Firms will double spend on open platforms, and no-code/low-code platforms will grow considerably.
Firms Are Investing Heavily in Digitizing the Front Office, Especially for Onboarding
Digital onboarding has become table stakes. Digital support for financial planning, client relationship management, and experience are also big areas of investment. Self-service functions like marketing and channel engagement and robo-advisory are getting the lowest investments, though this varies by subsector.
Despite Focus on Digital Onboarding, Firms Are Still Not Doing Enough
Top pain points for investors in opening a new account are providing authorizations and transferring funds from outside accounts, but only about one in five providers have digitized these processes. Providers have chiefly addressed digitizing regulatory KYC checks and basic procedures for opening an account online. Providers will ramp up efforts to digitize onboarding over the next two years, particularly adding account features, conducting UBO checks, and adding managed account proposals.
Robos Lead in Digital Onboarding Now, but Incumbents Will Jump Ahead in Two Years
Currently, robo-advisors, investment advisory groups, and retail asset management firms are furthest ahead in digital onboarding. In two years, institutional asset managers and private banks plan to overtake them.
Many Investors Are Not Satisfied with Their Digital Experiences
Only 18% of investors are very satisfied with the digital experience offered by their primary providers. The biggest complaint is the inability to see all investments in one place (44%), followed by lack of cooperation between providers (25%), and issues with mobile and tablet apps and websites.
Leaders Invest More Heavily in Digitizing Middle and Back Office
Leader firms invest more in data analytics, client account servicing, reporting, cybersecurity, and portfolio accounting. Leaders spend almost three times as much as others in tracking and analyzing corporate culture.
Over the Next Two Years, Firms Will Reinvent How They Get Work Done
Work for advisors and staff will become more digitized, making digital engagement more important than personal interaction for a third of firms. Remote working and web conferencing have made distance less relevant. More than a third of firms expect advisors to continue working from home or in hybrid arrangements. Automation will cut jobs for about one in five firms, but will increase productivity and job satisfaction.
The Financial, Operational, and Strategic Benefits from Going Digital
Almost half of all firms are seeing increased revenue from digital transformation now, and almost as many expect improved profitability in the next two years. Operational and strategic benefits include improved planning and decision-making, greater innovation, enhanced customer analysis and retention, and faster creation of new products. Leaders are seeing greater benefits than others, especially increased revenue.
Digital Transformation Supercharges Performance Across Multiple KPIs
Firms have seen a nearly 14% increase in productivity as a result of digital transformation, contributing to an 8.1% rise in assets under management. Digitization has also lifted revenue, market share, and shareholder value, though it has increased costs as firms invest in digital.
Shift Toward Holistic Financial Planning Is Paying Off
Financial planning is the area getting the highest return on digital investment for wealth management firms. Investments in finance and auditing, client reporting, and portfolio accounting are also generating high returns. Leaders are getting high ROI from digital investments in risk management, financial planning, customer identity management, portfolio accounting, and robo-advisory.
Calls to Action
“In wealth management, the human touch will always be there, because wealth and money have an emotional attachment, and that comes with other people. Technology can augment that attachment, helping advisors be more efficient with their time with clients while allowing them to continue to create deep emotional bonds. But shopping for a portfolio will never be like flipping through Netflix suggestions to find a movie to watch, where you never talk to anybody. I don't see the human advisor going away anytime soon.”
— Cory Haberkorn, Industry-Go-To-Market Senior Manager, Salesforce
David Donovan, Financial Services Practice Leader, NA, Publicis Sapient
Put frictionless experiences in your clients’ pockets
“Clients will want to access investment advisors on their mobile. People think about finance when they’re traveling, buying a house, or shopping. The more a financial platform can be connected to a client in a personalized way around moments that matter, the better the result for advisors and their clients. In essence, investors want their wealth managers to be personal CFOs that sit in their pockets.”
Brie Williams, Vice President, State Street Global Advisors
Leverage human capital
“Wealth management companies need to be thinking about whether they are the disruptors or disrupted. For industry leaders, core competencies will be business savviness, combined with the ability to build trust and leverage the technology to deliver a highly relevant experience at scale, for your clients. Beyond that, how firms truly leverage human capital will show the real opportunities for growth.”
Rohit Mahna, SVP, GM of Financial Services, Salesforce
Do more with less
“Over time, the number of financial advisors is going to shrink, while the expectations of clients—and their desire to be coached—will continue to grow. So, firms will need to figure out how to do more with less. That is where AI-driven hyper-personalization can assist. But to create the kind of advisor dashboard with the integrated tools required, firms will need to get their arms around their legacy systems and their data to make them work together.”
Andrew D’Anna, Head of Retail Experience, Charles Schwab
Create no-trade-off client experiences
“In the future, the winners will be those firms that create no-trade-off client experiences between high-touch and high-tech engagement. Clients want to control their own portfolios and make their own choices. But as they mature as investors and their needs change, they will want trusted human advice to help them through life events or market volatility. Firms that can do that in one place will be the ones that grow and scale in the future.”
Henning Stein, Global Head of Thought Leadership, Invesco Asset Management
Democratization, digital, and demystification
“The shift to digital wealth represents our brightest hope for truly democratizing investing. As an industry, we should be aiming to help as many people as possible understand how to get the most from their money. Crucially, that means digitization and democratization must go hand in hand with demystification.”
Our Partner: ThoughtLab
ThoughtLab is an innovative thought leadership and economic research firm providing fresh ideas and evidence-based analysis to help business and government leaders cope with transformative change. We specialize in analyzing the impact of technological, economic, and demographic shifts on industries, cities, and companies.
To learn more about ThoughtLab, visit: www.thoughtlabgroup.com
For further information about this study, please contact:
- David Donovan, Financial Services Practice Leader, North America: David.Donovan@publicissapient.com
- Manish Moorjani, Senior Director Product Management, Publicis Sapient: Manish.Moorjani@publicissapient.com